In Support of Food Biotechnology
Biotechnology is a safe way to produce
healthier food in greater quantities, as well as a cleaner
environment. Experience shows it. Regulation requires it.
And science proves it.
Biotechnology is beneficial to both
consumers and the environment. Through the use of biotechnology,
foods already have been developed that are better tasting,
take longer to ripen, are more disease and insect resistant
and are more flavorful. Food biotechnology also helps protect
the global environment, and is a key to the urgent problem
of feeding a growing world population.
Numerous experts have already weighed
in on the benefits of biotechnology:
Food Biotechnology is Safe
"One of the great consumer questions
of our time is: Will the world accept biotechnology? From
a purely scientific perspective, it's an odd question. We
already have. Biotechnology's been around almost since the
beginning of time. It's cavemen saving seeds of a high-yielding
plant. It's Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics, cross-pollinating
his garden peas. Our best scientists have searched for risks.
Without exception, the biotech products on our shelves have
proven safe."
Dan Glickman,U.S.
Secretary of Agriculture (March 13, 1999)
"We have spent considerable amount of
time and resources examining the science of gene technology
and how it would impact on the food supply and have concluded
that, provided that companies take the proper steps to examine
the important safety issues, these foods should be as safe
as other foods on the market. In addition to those steps that
breeders normally take, for products of [biotechnology], companies
are doing far more extensive testing than has ever been done
on commercial varieties. They are doing chemical analyses
for important nutrients, for toxicants. They are examining
the new substances, such as proteins that have been introduced
into these foods, in terms of possible toxicity and allergenicity
and taking other steps under the guidance of our scientists
in the government to ensure proper adequate testing before
they go to consumers."
James Maryanski, Ph.D., Biotechnology
Coordinator, U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(Worldnet, May 26, 1999)
"[Biotech foods] go through the same
rigorous review process for safety that applies to all of
our food and feed products."
Stuart Eizenstat, Former U.S. Undersec.
of State for Economic, Business and Agricultural Affairs (June
16, 1999)
"Right around the world, the scientific
evidence is that there is no problem with GMOs over and above
any other food."
David Byrne, Commissioner for Health
& Consumer Protection, European Commission
(The Lancet, September 2000)
"[There is] no evidence currently available
[that] GM foods have any adverse effect on human health."
Sir John Krebs, Chairman, British Food Standards Agency (Reuters,
September 6, 2000)
"We've never had the least
incidence with GMOs Š not a single incident in 25 years of
research and use. So, if [policies are] followed, I conclude
it's safe."
DMaurice Hofnung, Director, Molecular
Programming and Genetic Toxicology, The Pasteur Institute,
France (The Lancet, September 2000)
"To date, [the Australian/New
Zealand Food Authority] has found no evidence that GM foods
are less safe than their conventionally produced counterparts
Š a finding supported by food agencies around the world."
The Australian/New Zealand Food Authority
Press Statement (August 31, 2000)
"Crops modified by molecular
and cellular methods should pose risks no different from those
modified by classic genetic methods for similar traits."
Report, (U.S.) National Research
Council (1992)
"The overwhelming scientific
evidence argues against the supposition that DNA from transgenic
plants will somehow contaminate bacteria in humans and animals
and in some way cause mutations in people that eat foods from
genetically modified plants. The concern approaches the ridiculous
when critics propose that remnants of DNA that are found in
soy meal or soy oil will cause harm in humans."
Roger N. Beachy, Ph.D., President
of the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center on behalf of the
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (March 3,
1999)
"I have absolutely no anxiety. I
am worried about a lot of things, but not about modified food."
James Watson, Ph.D., co-discoverer
of DNA structure and Nobel Laureate, U.K.
(Daily Telegraph, February 25, 1999)
"Thirteen years of experience
with biotech products in the U.S. have shown us that biotech
foods developed and used in the U.S. present no food safety
risks beyond those of their "natural" counterparts
not a single ailment has been attributed to biotech
foods. Not one! Not a sneeze, not a rash, not a headache."
U.S. Ambassador David L. Aaron, U.S.
Undersecretary of Commerce for Trade (April 2000)
"From the standpoint of
the Food and Drug Administration, the important thing for
consumers to know about these new foods is that they will
be every bit as safe as the foods now on store shelves. All
foods, whether traditionally bred or genetically engineered,
must meet the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act."
"Genetic Engineering Fast Forwarding
to the Future Foods;" (FDA Consumer magazine April 1995; revised
February 1998)
"We do not believe that
obligatory [biotech] labeling is necessary, because it would
suggest a health risk where there is none. Mandatory labelling
could mislead consumers about the safety of these products
and require segregation of [biotech] and [non-biotech] foods."
Isi Siddiqui, Special Assistant for
Trade to the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture
(Reuters, July 27, 1999)
"The responsible genetic
modification of plants is neither new nor dangerous. Many
characteristics, such as pest and disease resistance, have
been routinely introduced into crop plants by traditional
methods of sexual reproduction or cell culture procedures."
Petition Signed by Nearly 3,000 Scientists
Globally in Support of Biotechnology
(January 2001)
"A broad scientific consensus
holds that modern techniques of genetic engineering are essentially
a refinement of the kinds of genetic modification that have
long been used to enhance plants, micro-organisms and animals
for food. The products of the newer techniques are even more
predictable and safer than the genetically engineered foods
that have long enriched our diet."
Henry Miller, Fellow, Hoover Institute,
Stanford University (Financial Times, June 17, 1999)
"All the food we eat, with
the exception of wild game, has been genetically engineered.
It's interesting as a political issue, but I haven't seen
much that points to any safety concerns."
Hank Greely, Co-Director, Program in
Genomics, Ethics & Society, Stanford University; (June 18,
1999)
Food Biotechnology Benefits Consumers
"The newer biotechnology
techniques open up very great possibilities of rapidly improving
the quantity and quality of food available. The use of these
techniques does not result in food which is inherently less
safe than that produced by conventional ones."
Report of a Joint Consultation of
theU.N. Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health
Organization (1991)
"Biotechnology provides new and
powerful tools for research and for accelerating the development
of new and better foods. The benefits of biotechnology are
many and include providing resistance to crop pests to improve
production and reduce chemical pesticide usage, thereby making
major improvements in both food quality and nutrition."
Report of a Joint Consultation of
the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health
Organization (1996)
"In addition to safer foods, biotechnology
also has the potential to bring about the creation of more
nutritious foods. it would be a significant loss to humanity
if the many benefits of biotechnology were not realized because
of concerns that have little basis in scientific fact."
Brian Larkins, Ph.D., President,
American Society of Plant Physiologists and Professor, Department
of Plant Science, The University of Arizona (The Wall Street
Journal, July 29, 1999)
"Genetic modification offers the
opportunity to decrease or eliminate the protein allergens
that occur naturally in foods. An example is the development
of a genetically modified rice variety developed through anti-sense
technology, which dramatically reduced levels of the major
rice allergen."
Report of a Joint Consultation of
the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health
Organization (1996)
"Agricultural biotechnology holds
promise for a hungry and ecologically fragile world. The development
of new crop varieties that offer increased yields, reduced
inputs, and offer specialized traits that meet end-user needs
is merely the starting point."
Stephen S. Censky, Chief Executive
Officer, American Soybean Association (May 26, 1999)
"It is the position of The American
Dietetic Association that biotechnology techniques have the
potential to be useful in enhancing the quality, nutritional
value, and variety of food available for human consumption
and in increasing the efficiency of food production, food
processing food distribution, and waste management."
Position statement of the American
Dietetic Association; October 18, 1992 (Reaffirmed September
9, 1994)
"Regardless of how we measure
consumer perceptions, surveys document that between two-thirds
and three-quarters of American respondents are positive about
plant biotechnology."
Thomas Hoban, Professor, North Carolina
State University (The Financial Times, February 19, 1999)
Food Biotechnology Benefits the Environment
"Scientists are gaining the ability
to insert genes that give biological defense against diseases
and insects, thus reducing the need for chemical pesticides,
and convey genetic traits that enable crops to better withstand
drought conditions. With this powerful new genetic knowledge,
scientists have the capability to pack large amounts of technology
into a single seed."
Norman Borlaug, Ph.D., Nobel Peace
Prize Laureate (Testimony before the U.S. Senate Agriculture
Committee, July 31, 1997)
"Simply put, [agricultural biotechnology]
is the most promising, precise and advanced strategy available
today for meeting the challenges of reduced use of synthetic
chemical pesticides, the need for nutritionally and functionally
improved plants, and the need for improved resistance to pests
and diseases."
Institute of Food Technologists (October
1996)
"We are increasingly encouraged
that the advantages of genetic engineering of plants and animals
are greater than the risks. The risks should be carefully
followed through openness, analysis and controls, but without
a sense of alarm. We cannot agree with the position of some
groups that say it is against the will of God to meddle with
the genetic make-up of plants and animals."
Bishop Elio Sgreccia, Vice President,
Pontifical Academy for Life, The Vatican
(St. Louis Review, October 22, 1999)
"I'm quite confident that, when
the public is properly informed about biotech, they will realize
that the positive benefits are far away any potential negative
benefits. In fact, we donÕt really know of any negative aspects
for GMOs but we do know of many positive ones, both socially
and environmentally."
Dr. Patrick Moore, Former President
of Greenpeace (New Scientist, December 25, 1999)
Food Biotechnology Benefits Farmers
". what everyone must understand
is to maintain the productivity of agriculture, we must continue
to improve the agricultural seeds that are used. We have been
doing this for generations. We are now blessed through research
and technology with new methods of actually speeding up the
process of improving the seeds and the products we get from
them. The most important thing we have to do is get the message
out about the benefits of these [biotech] products."
Melinda Kimble, Assistant U.S. Secretary
of State for Oceans and International and Environmental Scientific
Affairs (acting) (Worldnet, May 26, 1999)
"Biotechnology is an important tool
which must be made available to emerging markets. This investment
helps U.S. farmers by creating a greater demand for our agricultural
products and much of the technology comes back to U.S. farmers
to make them even more competitive."
Per Pinstrup-Andersen, Ph.D., Director,
International Food Policy Research Institute (February 5,
1999)
If we turn our back on [agricultural
biotechnology] we are turning our back on the next generation
of plants for farmers."
Dr. Tony Conner, (New Zealand) Crown
Research Institute (June 15, 1999)
Food Biotechnology Can Help Counter World
Hunger
"If imports like these [biotechnology
crops] are regulated unnecessarily, the real losers will be
the developing nations. Instead of reaping the benefits of
decades of discovery and research, people from Africa and
Southeast Asia will remain prisoners of outdated technology.
Their countries could suffer greatly for years to come. It
is crucial that they reject the propaganda of extremist groups
before it is too late."
Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter
(The New York Times, August 26, 1998)
"Bioengineered crops. could improve
food yields by up to 25 percent in the developing world and
help feed the 3 billion people to be born over the next 30
years."
1997 World Bank and Consultative
Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)
"It's easy for the United Kingdom and
the United States to say we donÕt need more food, but this
is the voice of the developing world which has faced a great
deal of starvation in the past."
Dr. Bruce Alberts, President, (U.S.)
National Academy of Science
"Given the socioeconomic realities
and needs in countries like South Africa and China, it is
almost trivial to discuss whether they should use a technology
that already has shown its benefits to their populations.
These countries cannot afford to limit themselves to the industrialized
world's narrow interpretation of risk assessment. Likewise,
they cannot afford to allow the Western debate to slow developing
countries' access to already existing and expected future
benefits of biotechnology."
Jennifer A. Thomson, Director, Dept.
of Microbiology, The University of Cape Town,(So. Africa)
and Zhang-Liang Chen,Director, National Laboratory of Protein
Engineering and Plant Genetic Engineering (China) and chair,
UNESCO Plant Biotechnology Committee
(Los Angeles Times Op-Ed, April 10, 2000)
Food Biotechnology Benefits Third World Nations
"It is the developing world which has
the greatest need for the new knowledge and techniques promised
by biotechnology. Unnecessary delay could have disastrous
consequences for the food security of millions."
Donald J. Johnston, Secretary General,
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; "A
Defense of Modern Biotechnology," (OECD Observer, No. 21,
March, 1999)
"I believe the world will be able to produce the food
needed to feed [its] projected population of 8.3 million by
2025. But it cannot be attained without permitting use of
technologies now available, or without research. including
biotechnology and recombinant DNA."
Norman Borlaug 1970 Nobel Prize Recipient
"We Need Biotech to Feed the World"
(Wall Street Journal Editorial, December 6, 2000)
"Modern biotechnology is not a silver
bullet for achieving food security, but, used in conjunction
with other agricultural research, it may be a powerful tool
in the fight against poverty. It has the potential to help
enhance agricultural productivity in developing countries
in a way that further reduces poverty, improves food security
and nutrition, and promotes sustainable use of natural resources.
Solutions to the problems facing small farmers in developing
countries could benefit both farmers and consumers."
Gabrielle J. Persley, Co-Editor,
Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor CGIAR/U.S. National
Academy of Sciences Conference
"It is important to increase yield
on land that is already intensely cultivated. However, increasing
production is only one part of the equation. Income generation,
particularly in low-income areas together with the more effective
distribution of food stocks, are equally, if not more, important.
GM technologies are relevant to both these elements of food
security."
Report prepared jointly by the Royal
Society of London, U.S. National Academy of Sciences, Indian
National Academy of Sciences, Mexican National Academy of
Sciences and the Third World Academy of Sciences (July 2000)
"Through judicious development, biotechnology
can also address environmental degradation, hunger, and poverty
in the developing world by providing improved agricultural
productivity and greater nutritional security."
Petition Signed by Nearly 3,000 Scientists
Globally in Support of Biotechnology (January 2001)
"[Biotechnology] will make farmers wealthier, especially
in developing countries where they need to grow more food
per hectare. It will be good for society. It will make food
more nutritious and healthier. And, it will be good for the
environment in reducing reliance on chemicals and in using
less land to grow the same food for our 6 billion people in
the world."
Dr. Patrick Moore, Former President
of Greenpeace (Thai Television (Channel 11), September 4,
2000)
"In China, the public generally accepts commercialization
of transgenic plants and most people [believe] that. agrobiotechnology
is a powerful tool for promoting agricultural production and
[providing] enough food for the world especially. developing
countries in the future."
Zhang-Liang Chen, Peking University
(China) OECD Conference on the Scientific and Health Aspects
of Genetically Modified Foods (February 28 - March 1, 2000)
top
|